Topic 7: Evaluation
(6 hours)
7.1 Evaluation and designing
2 hours
|
|
Assessment statement |
Obj |
Notes |
References |
|
Outline
the general criteria used to evaluate products. |
2 |
Consider
performance, reliability, ease of use, safety, aesthetics, materials,
construction and cost. |
|
|
|
Explain
how the criteria used to evaluate products will vary depending on the purpose
of the evaluation. |
3 |
For
example, crash-testing cars is done in relation to
safety only. |
|
|
|
7.1.3 |
Apply
the general criteria to evaluate products. |
2 |
|
|
|
7.1.4 |
Explain
the use of qualitative and/or quantitative tests, models and experiments used
to evaluate ideas at the design development stage (developing chosen
solution) of the design cycle. |
3 |
Consider
the use of scale models to evaluate shape, form and proportion; materials
tests; construction technique tests, and so on. |
|
|
7.1.5 |
Define
literature search. |
1 |
|
|
|
7.1.6 |
Describe
one advantage and one disadvantage of literature search for data collection. |
2 |
Many
sources of information are available, but there may be an abundance of data, which can be
too time-consuming. |
|
|
7.1.7 |
Evaluate
the importance of ICT in aiding literature searching. |
3 |
Consider
access to information, speed, costs, storage and security. |
|
|
Define
user trial. |
1 |
|
|
|
|
7.1.9 |
Describe
one advantage and one disadvantage of a user trial to collect data. |
2 |
The
“user” is a non-specialist, which makes trials easier and cost-effective.
However, users may carry out tasks in different ways from those expected and
be inexperienced. |
|
|
7.1.10 |
Define
user research. |
1 |
|
|
|
7.1.11 |
Describe
one advantage and one disadvantage of user research to collect data. |
2 |
Data
is relatively easy and cheap to obtain but is largely qualitative. |
|
|
7.1.12 |
Compare
user research with user trial. |
3 |
With
user research, data is collected by obtaining users’ responses to questions.
User trial data is collected by observing users’ behaviour. |
|
|
7.1.13 |
Define
expert appraisal. |
1 |
|
|
|
7.1.14 |
Describe
one advantage and one disadvantage of using expert appraisal to collect data. |
2 |
For
example, expert knowledge and advice are gained (compared to a user trial),
but the expert may be biased. It may also be difficult to locate an expert.
Data is usually qualitative. |
|
7.2 Evaluation and manufacturing
2 hours
|
|
Assessment statement |
Obj |
Notes |
References |
|
Identify
the nature of evaluation at different stages of the product cycle. |
2 |
Different
types of market research, for example, evaluating competitive products,
evaluating the success of a new product and evaluating for redesign. |
|
|
|
7.2.2 |
Define
cost-effectiveness. |
1 |
|
|
|
7.2.3 |
Explain
the importance of cost effectiveness to manufacturers. |
3 |
In
order to maximize profit, manufacturers require the most cost-effective
production system. This is often the major aim of the brief for designers. |
|
|
Define
quality control and quality assurance. |
1 |
|
|
|
|
7.2.5 |
Compare
quality control with quality assurance for manufactured products. |
3 |
|
|
|
7.2.6 |
Define
performance test. |
1 |
|
|
|
7.2.7 |
Describe
one advantage and one disadvantage of using a performance test to collect
data. |
2 |
It
is possible to collect quantitative data, but the test may be time-consuming
and costly. It can be used where a user trial is not feasible, for example,
crash-testing cars. |
|
|
Define
field trial. |
1 |
|
|
|
|
7.2.9 |
Describe
one advantage and one disadvantage of using a field trial to collect data. |
2 |
Field
trials are usually quite extensive exercises, so can be expensive, but the
product is tested in the marketplace, which provides data that is different
from laboratory-based evaluations. |
|
7.3 Evaluation and the consumer
2 hours
|
|
Assessment statement |
Obj |
Notes |
References |
|
7.3.1 |
Define
value for money. |
1 |
|
|
|
Compare
price with value when assessing a product for value for money. |
3 |
If
the price is too high, there may not be enough potential purchasers who can
afford it or think the product is value for money. If the price is too low,
consumers may think the product is too cheap to have much value. Demand for a
product will generally establish the maximum price that can be charged, and
the costs of production will determine the minimum price that is acceptable.
However, a company may choose to set its price in relation to its
competitors, or it may choose to set the price in accordance with the
perceived value of the product. |
|
|
|
7.3.3 |
Explain
how consumers apply criteria to evaluate a product for value for money,
referring to before purchase, purchase, initial use and long-term use. |
3 |
Before
purchase: advertising, manufacturer’s specification, list price, product
image, and evaluation by experts and consumer groups. Purchase: aesthetics,
performance, build quality and purchase price. Initial use: actual
performance, safety and ease of use. Long-term use: reliability, ease of
maintenance, durability and running costs. |
|
|
7.3.4 |
Discuss
how the criteria in 7.3.3 are assigned different weightings depending on the
design context. |
3 |
Value
judgments play a part in product analysis, and they vary according to the
individual, the time (era) and the circumstances. Consumers often value
utility, security, availability, rarity and aesthetics, while designers may
consider function, reliability and ease of maintenance more important. |
|
|
7.3.5 |
Explain
the relevance of quality assurance to consumers. |
3 |
Quality
assurance means that consumers do not have to carry out their own research when
considering purchasing products, and they have a means of redress if a
product fails to match expected standards, for example, via a guarantee. |
|
|
7.3.6 |
Discuss
the role of consumer associations for product evaluation. |
3 |
Consumer
associations are independent organizations. They carry out tests on products
to see if manufacturers’ claims are justified, and they provide published
data for consumers. They compare similar products within a target market and
recommend the best value-for-money products. |
|
|
7.3.7 |
Explain
the contribution of the media and education to product evaluation. |
3 |
Consider
the contribution of consumer and lifestyle programmes,
the weekend sections of newspapers and consumer journals, and their focus on
new products. Also curriculum development and design education in schools. |
|