Topic 3: Green
Design (9 hours)
Green
design involves taking a “cradle to grave” approach to the design of a product
by considering the
adverse impacts of the product at all stages of its life
(pre-production, production, distribution, including
packaging, utilization and disposal) and seeking to minimize
those impacts.
3.1 Principles of Green Design
2 hours
|
|
Assessment statement |
Obj |
Notes |
References |
|
3.1.1 |
Define
green design, renewable resources and non-renewable
resources |
1 |
Considering the adverse impact of the
product on the environment at every stage ( design, production, use,
disposal) and minimizing these effects. |
|
|
3.1.2 |
Outline the reasons for green
design. |
2 |
Consider consumer pressure and legislation |
|
|
3.1.3 |
List design objectives for green products |
1 |
Objectives include: • increasing efficiency in the use
of
materials, energy and other resources • minimizing damage or pollution
from the
chosen materials • reducing to a minimum any
long-term
harm caused by use of the product • ensuring that the planned life of
the product is most appropriate in
environmental terms and that the product
functions efficiently for its full life • taking full account of the
effects of the end
disposal of the product • ensuring that the packaging and
instructions encourage efficient and
environmentally friendly use • minimizing nuisances such as
noise or
smell • analysing
and minimizing potential safety
hazards. |
|
|
3.1.4 |
Discuss the impact of “take back”
legislation on designers and manufacturers of cars, refrigerators and washing
machines |
1 |
|
|
|
3.1.5 |
Explain how people can be broadly classified
according to their attitudes to green issues. |
3 |
People’s attitudes to green issues
vary. Eco-warriors actively demonstrate on environmental issues. Eco-champions champion environmental issues
within organizations. Eco-fans enthusiastically adopt
environmentally friendly practices as consumers. Eco-phobes actively resent talk of environmental protection. |
|
|
3.2 GREEN DESIGN: LIFECYCLE ANALYSIS 5 hours |
||||
|
3.2.1 |
Define life cycle analysis. |
1 |
The assessment of the effect a product has on the environment
from the initial concept to disposal. |
|
|
3.2.2 |
Describe how life cycle analysis
provides a framework within which clean production technologies and green design
can be evaluated holistically for a specific product. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.2.3 |
List the key stages in life cycle
analysis. |
1 |
Pre-production, production,
distribution including packaging, utilization and disposal. |
|
|
3.2.4 |
List the major environmental
considerations in life cycle analysis |
1 |
Water, soil pollution and
degradation, air contamination,
noise, energy
consumption, consumption of natural resources,
pollution and effect on ecosystems |
|
|
3.2.5 |
Describe how the life cycle stages
and the environmental considerations can
be organized into an environmental impact assessment matrix. |
2 |
Each stage of the life cycle analysis mapped against water
relevance, soil pollution and degradation, air contamination, noise,
consumption of natural resources, and the effects on ecosystems on a matrix –
see resources |
|
|
3.2.6 |
Analyse the environmental impact of refrigerators, washing machines and cars using
an environmental impact assessment matrix. |
3 |
Use the environmental impact matrix |
|
|
3.2.7 |
Explain why elements of the matrix
may differ in importance according to the particular design context. |
3 |
For example in the case of cars the larger
part of energy consumption takes place in the use rather than the
manufacture. |
|
|
3.2.8 |
Identify
the roles and responsibilities of the designer, manufacturer and user at each
life cycle stage of a product |
2 |
|
|
|
3.2.9 |
Describe one example of a situation where
life cycle analysis identifies conflicts that have to be resolved through
prioritization. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.2.10 |
Explain that life cycle analysis is
targeted at particular product categories. |
3 |
Life cycle analysis is targeted at
products with a high environmental impact and in the global marketplace. It
is then impossible for companies to argue that their products are being made
uncompetitive. Life cycle analysis also targets companies with the resources
to invest in R&D. |
|
|
3.2.11 |
Explain why life cycle analysis is
not widely used in practice. |
3 |
Life cycle analysis is not used for
many products. However, in the re-innovation of the design of a product or its
manufacture, specific aspects may be changed after considering the design
objectives for green products. Thus the materials selected may be changed to
make them more environmentally friendly, for example, wood from sustainable
forests or the selection of a less toxic varnish. A product may be
distributed differently or its packaging may be redesigned. |
|
|
3.2.12 |
Describe the reasons for the
introduction of eco-labelling schemes. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.2.13 |
Explain how eco-labelling
reflects life cycle analysis of certain product categories. |
3 |
|
|
|
3.2.14 |
Compare the objectives of two
different eco-labelling schemes. |
3 |
Consider approaches to eco-labelling in Europe, Australia and the United States
(US). |
|
|
3.2.15 |
Explain how eco-labelling
and energy-labelling schemes can help consumers to
compare potential
|
3 |
|
|
|
3.3
GREEN DESIGN: STRATEGIES FOR GREEN DESIGN
2 hours |
||||
|
3.3.1 |
Define design for manufacture (DfM). |
1 |
Designers design specifically for optimum use of existing
manufacturing capability |
|
|
3.3.2 |
Describe why DfM
can be a dominating constraint on the design brief and state that it can be conveniently
split into design for materials, design for process and design for assembly. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.3.3 |
Define design for materials,
design for
|
1 |
DFM – designing in relation to materials during processing DFP – designing to enable the product to be manufactured using a
specific manufacturing process. DFA – designing taking account of assembly at different levels |
|
|
3.3.4 |
Discuss three strategies that
designers could employ for DfM. |
3 |
Strategies include: minimizing the
number of components, using standard
components, designing components that are multifunctional or for multi-use,
designing parts for ease of fabrication, minimizing handling, and using
standard sub-assemblies. |
|
|
3.3.5 |
Describe how designers can modify
the environmental impact of the production, use and disposal of their product
through careful consideration at the design stage. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.3.6 |
Define reuse, repair,
reconditioning and recycling. |
|
Reuse – use again in the
same or different context Repair – the reconstruction
or renewal of a part of an existing structure Reconditioning – rebuilding to make
as new. Recycling – using materials
from obsolete products to create other products |
|
|
3.3.7 |
Describe how reuse, repair, reconditioning
and recycling contribute to the optimization of resource utilization. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.3.8 |
Describe how the strategies of reuse,
repair and recycling can be applied to the design of products, including
packaging. |
2 |
For example, consider disposable
cameras, vacuum cleaners and car tyres. |
|
|
3.3.9 |
List three material groups that can
be easily and economically recycled |
1 |
Consider thermoplastics, metals and
glass, textiles and paper. |
|
|
3.3.10 |
Describe how many products comprise
several different materials, and state that these materials have to be separated to enable recycling. |
2 |
|
|
|
3.3.11 |
Discuss the issues underpinning the
economic recycling of materials. |
|||